The next bit says "the United Nations Organization for Trade sets the figure much higher" NB: this one is a tax loss figure (but for a different group of countries/not 'Africa') - suggests that they think the figure above is a tax loss?
-
However, a concrete example is how your own NGO
@oxfamibis puts emphasis on moral indignation making message fit campaign template. I questioned the incorrect interpretation of the Acacia case in Tanzania as shared on Facebook here: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154806539270964&id=144965885963 …. No reply back btw
Wow! I hadn't seen this. Naive if nothing else to view the Acacia case in simple "Say No to Tax Havens!" termspic.twitter.com/VTUUYHXL7G
-
-
Hi Maya. Would you not agree that it's a step in the right direction, that governments in developing countries challenge and stand up to the big coorperations of which many don't pay a fair tax - if any - and demand more? We think so and that was our take on it.
-
@oxfamibis if you read my original & elaborate comment on your FB update (which you never answered) you'd see that it's questionable what is going on in Tanzania in respective case. Too many unanswered questions to conclude the way you do. Thus, your question above is absurd. - 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Yes...! There are too many wrong assumptions made here about tax, Acacia, Magufuli and Tanzania. My comment on the update remains ignored - that's always interesting
-
Admittedly we are not Tanzania experts. And our SoMe team used the case as a good example based on second source info. Congratulations! You found one!
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.