You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Ooohhh, true, much of the aggressive tax avoidance is not illegal in the sense that is has not been actually found illegal in the courts - yet. The result on the ground is the same - lost tax revenues
No - that's not what the HLP was trying to estimate -- it was trying to estimate' illicit financial flows' -- their number is not directly a tax loss either to avoidance or evasion. Its an estimate of a gross capital flow
Yes of course. Inspired by the GFI methodology it is gross IFF. It is not the estimate of tax loss - and I don't think the Danish text indicates that. The important issue is that we have huge amounts and only rough estimates. See also recent research by Zugman and colleagues
Maybe its lost in translation but 'Afrika snydes for mere end 300 milliarder kroner årligt i ulovlig skatteunddragelse' = Africa is cheated of more than 50 bn dollars annually in illegal tax evasion ? Suggest @DanWatchDK think its a tax loss.
Which have a variety of elements. But avoidance not agreed to be one. Different views. See series of posts. https://medium.com/u4-anti-corruption-resource-centre/iff-definitions-3f3d0ba106c3 …
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
