Maya Forstater

I contest that not only many of the purposes of the yellow zone but also the green zone are socially unhelpful, and the privacy argument is usefully employed by tax lawyers but is a straw man - as the registers can easily be configured to protect privacy in the cases mentioned.

I agree the question is what in the yellow and green zones are socially useful or harmful. I don't think the privacy question is quite so easy. Public registers imply loss of privacy. There are trade offs & questions

Imply is not the same as 'prescribe'. As I mentioned, public registers that operate with respect for privacy are commonplace.

How is that possible? e.g. If you are a PSC of a UK co you have to be on the register unless there are ‘exceptional circumstances’ (serious risk of violence or intimidation). U cannot say 'I'd prefer to keep that info out of public domain

So there is a loss of privacy. Maybe that loss of privacy is justified - necessary & proportionate. But we cannot say there is no loss of privacy for law abiding people.

And here within is where the debate should begin. Who should have to disclose what on a public register, and why? Should you be able to avoid the register if you're a HNWI? Should paying to obscure ownership be possible? Far better questions.

In your CGD policy paper, you scrutinize the figures on losses from tax revenue with some skepticism... https://www.cgdev.org/sites/default/files/CGD-policy-paper-69-Forstater-tax-dodging-dev-finance_2.pdf …

... may I ask you to provide some figures to support your assertion that in offshores "money is generally not ‘parked’ offshore but ultimately invested in the real (onshore) economy"? How are you able to assess that this is 'generally' the case without visibility?