Also @MKSolicitors is not impressed with @fichtner_jan @javiergb_com 's 'Sinks and Conduits' paper http://www.fcpablog.com/blog/2017/9/19/martin-kenney-academics-skew-picture-of-bvi-and-other-offsho.html … (lesson: researchers should talk to practitioners more)
-
"The practice of layering, in anti-money laundering parlance..." & your link suggests you are referring to the 2nd stage in money laundering as in "placement, layering and integration"
You go on to say - A cursory survey of the papers indicates that large MNCs, PEPs & HNWIs are leveraging intermediaries and offshore firms to mediate their interest and make investments which minimize their tax obligations....seems to suggest this = 'layering"? (but it doesn't)
-
-
By 'you go on to say' you mean 'make a separate statement in an another paragraph about another issue'. Just because two sentences occur in the same article doesn't make them a discussion of the same concept. It's a misrepresentation of the argument.
-
It comes straight after the section on layering -- you say 'no one is talking about (the money laundering process) of layering' .... So read the next paragraph as being examples of what you mean by layering, not about something else
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.