It's disheartening to hear that some corporations are putting their efforts into "re-interpreting" the SDGs rather than achieving them.https://twitter.com/fp2p/status/878876163002712064 …
-
-
Replying to @beck_smith
@fp2p@viewfromthecave hard to buy idea of unanimous agreement that tax avoidance =IFF . See interagency WP on defn: http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Illicit-financial-flows-conceptual-paper_FfDO-working-paper.pdf …pic.twitter.com/qqQ4HnYBNE
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
That is a fair point. What do you make of it
@alexcobham?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @viewfromthecave @MForstater and
This is more a symptom than evidence to the contrary- the IATF is where the big push back started.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @viewfromthecave and
That is: IMF, UNODC and others at IATF trying to remove avoidance from the definition during the indicator process
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @viewfromthecave and
It’s a 20 p report w references on this Q! If “research & policy analysis were unanimous“ it wld hv been shorter!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @viewfromthecave and
That seems disingenuous, Maya, given our earlier exchange. Unanimity relates to the inclusion of (some) multinational tax abuse.
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @viewfromthecave and
Alex. Is there unanimity on which some? Yr notes say abuse, avoidance, aggressive avoidance - so many definitional cans of worms
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Practical eg.s may help? If Acacia underreported Au by 10x = illicit. Zara managing brand centrally = not Illicithttps://hiyamaya.wordpress.com/2017/04/13/the-zara-report-what-can-we-learn-about-public-country-by-country-reporting/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.