It's disheartening to hear that some corporations are putting their efforts into "re-interpreting" the SDGs rather than achieving them.https://twitter.com/fp2p/status/878876163002712064 …
-
That seems disingenuous, Maya, given our earlier exchange. Unanimity relates to the inclusion of (some) multinational tax abuse.
Also the Addis AAA seems pretty clear. IFFs includes evasion and corruption & 'We will *also* reduce opportunities for tax avoidancepic.twitter.com/T3QMK1vMEL
-
-
Is it possible to agree that: 1) Avoidance is bad and should have been in SDGs 2) No real consensus around avoidance counting as IFFs ....
-
3) Such a focus now on FFD/DRM, especially around funding SDGs, that avoidance is already getting attention, marginal impact of SDG unclear?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's naughty. Here's the context in case people aren't familiar - the whole para (and next one) refer to IFF.pic.twitter.com/UpEyzXb0Mk
-
I'm confused. What does full context change? Use of 'also' still reads to me like illicit one thing avoidance another.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.