“Research and policy analysis on illicit financial flows are unanimous in including multinational tax abuses in the definition" ?? Really?https://twitter.com/alexcobham/status/878294796665856000 …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
e.g. see Interagency Task Force on Financing for Development http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Illicit-financial-flows-conceptual-paper_FfDO-working-paper.pdf …pic.twitter.com/Y7L3k1JNXo
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
Lack of agreement extends to *which* multinational tax abuses are included, not whether any are. Do you know a definition excluding all?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
Core definition seems to be illegally earned/transferred/utilised + cross border - so includes so tax related illicit flows = evasion
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
That's the narrowest definition I think, yes - so you'd agree none would exclude multinationals?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes I agree I have not seen any definitions that exclude any group - definition seems focused on $s linked to illegality, crossing borders
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.