i.e. the big estimates interpret data mismatches as MNCs undertaking major customs fraud, massive smugglinghttps://www.cgdev.org/blog/gaps-trade-data-criminal-money-laundering …
My understanding “illicit” in IFFs means flow may not be illegal - but somewhere: source/transfer/use connects to illegality (inc evasion)
-
-
A flow in which the source and/or transaction is illegal, would be an illegal flow. Wouldn't it?
-
Flows have two ends. Could be illegal at one end (customs fraud - underinvoicing) but all look fine at the other, but still part of IFF, no?
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.