The argument that the definition of #illicitflows should include #tax avoidance is weirdly circular (.....thread to follow)https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/868026921250160641 …
So what? if the defn is 'illegal' & someone labels a behaviour (e.g. customs fraud) 'avoidance' that does not rule it out of the definition
-
-
Also this bit. "Secrecy" is not the same thing as submitting information to the revenue authority!pic.twitter.com/whXwDK8UYH
-
Does "illicit" mean "illegal"? If no, then can include anything. If yes, then A. excluded? Do IFFs need secrecy? Does "secret" = not public?
- 14 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.