Maya Forstater

I can understand being unconvinced, but are costs so high that it can't be justified on grounds it might be helpful?

I think the costs/risks are real so needs clearer justification than ‘might be helpful’ e.g. Helpful for what? How do we know?

I.e. What is the chance that a proposed tool developed in 2003 and little changed since must be the best approach?

Best too much to ask. Step forward good enough. I realise I need to read your work on this and exercise some brain cells but ...

.. My naive supposition was that if risk is vexatious attacks by campaigners, corps would then only do things relatively easy to defend ..

Anything which leads to timing differences between book recognition and tax recognition tends to get attacked. It's just not worth it.

isn't that easy to explain? won't corps easily withstand daft attacks such as that?