A couple of interesting new academic papers for you today:
-
Hmm. 2 separate issues. Conceptual misunderstandings, that's a problem. But the crux of the human rights argument is relevant nonetheless
HR argument always seems to rest on misunderstood huge numbers. Seems like a fundamental problem to showing HR frame practical use on this
-
-
Still two different issues for me. Even if the number was $1 lost to IFF/tax av/ev mechanisms, HR arguments apply (but wd not be as potent)
-
How about if $1 was lost through inefficiency? Both are important. Just not clear to me that HR lens adds practical information.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Feels to me like magical thinking: if we can show HR principles are engaged then tax rules will reform by themselves. No need for hard work.
-
I think it is pol. economy at work: much easier to influence western tax policy than real vectors of HR abuses!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.