I wish they’d stop saying this study was about sweatshops. Findings really interesting. But not about sweatshops https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2843595 …https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/857673223160422401 …
-
Think we are using different definitions. Many people think of sweatshops as low wages, long hours, poor conditions, not nec unregulated.
Perhaps, but people also think of sweatshops as 'brands should not source from these firms'
-
-
So? How do consumers' concerns about working conditions in some factories undermine the argument that some factories don't reduce poverty?
-
It doesn't. Point is language is pejorative, sensationalist. Why not say 'factories' Would not be OK to label workers who quit 'slackers'!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.