I wish they’d stop saying this study was about sweatshops. Findings really interesting. But not about sweatshops https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2843595 …https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/857673223160422401 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But not in the text. They didn't seek out unregulated, non-compliant firms. Most were unionised. (But found health risks).pic.twitter.com/94AxuvoDk3
Think we are using different definitions. Many people think of sweatshops as low wages, long hours, poor conditions, not nec unregulated.
Perhaps, but people also think of sweatshops as 'brands should not source from these firms'
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.