While I love this sort of comment for the possible implication that the current system doesn't suffer (or seek?) massive double non-taxationhttps://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/851921488189980673 …
...iphones in an authorized reseller? Looks like same real activity so ALP logic makes sense (as a relatively simple concrete example)
-
-
So rather than the value being in the Caymans it actually derives from the sales and splitting the IP royalty on sales would be better ALP.
-
But (main?) reason people buy is to access product/brand name. So value not with customers?
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Apple has intangible value based on its IP, but the value of that is predicated on current/future sales. (Eg Blackberry value now). Sales!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.