Scepticism from @MForstater about public disclosure of beneficial ownership info. Instead we should rely on professionals to check info.https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/848811888662237184 …
-
Evidence that CSPs do a poor job - look at Dr Sharman's work & leaks from offshore centres. Sometimes CSPs collude with clients to hide info
Sharman finds "best performing jurisdictions were those that have a licencing regime for their CSPs" https://www.jerseyfinance.je/media/PDF-Marketing/Jason%20Sharman%20Report%20-%20Solving%20the%20Beneficial%20Ownership%20Conundrum.pdf …
-
-
Agree that offshore CSPs may be better than onshore ones. But leak after leak shows that offshore CSPs are often doing a pretty bad job too
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It doesn't have to be either/or - this seems to be a weakness in your argument. Yes, license CSPs. Yes allow open access.
-
Agreed. Whole range of options - https://www.cmi.no/publications/file/6201-beneficial-openness.pdf … Verification & access by law enforcement matter for FATFpic.twitter.com/b1MVxLKtPB
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sharman concludes that effectively regulating CSPs likely to be better bet than unverified public registers, or regulatory inspectionpic.twitter.com/MikF1ON1HW
-
One where we'll have to agree to disagree. I also think public registries aren't just for AML but also for a better business environment
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.