Scepticism from @MForstater about public disclosure of beneficial ownership info. Instead we should rely on professionals to check info.https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/848811888662237184 …
-
-
Replying to @robertnpalmer @MForstater
But there's lots of evidence that professionals do a poor job of due diligence, even in "high" regulation countries.
#PanamaPapers1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertnpalmer @MForstater
As per recent 'Laundromat' revelations?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TobyQuantrill1 @MForstater
Quite. Or
@Global_Witness@60Minutes expose: http://bit.ly/20hY2wr . But important to think about quality and privacy issues.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @robertnpalmer @TobyQuantrill1 and
Indeed. Is cheap-and-cheerful transparency best/only solution given that dishonest people with stuff to hide will lie + privacy matters
2 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @TobyQuantrill1 and
And info on what companies are doing / are owned by is crucial for healthy economies. Here's
@CountCulture fav quote https://www.opengovpartnership.org/blog/chris-taggart/2013/10/28/why-opening-company-ownership-data-good-business …pic.twitter.com/TIJbzoXNGM
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @robertnpalmer @TobyQuantrill1 and
I think two different Qs - how to make it easy for those who want to assure ID to do so, & how to make it hard for criminals to hide.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
..not necessary to have same Swiss army knife solution to both.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.