Scepticism from @MForstater about public disclosure of beneficial ownership info. Instead we should rely on professionals to check info.https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/848811888662237184 …
-
Quite. Or
@Global_Witness@60Minutes expose: http://bit.ly/20hY2wr . But important to think about quality and privacy issues.
Indeed. Is cheap-and-cheerful transparency best/only solution given that dishonest people with stuff to hide will lie + privacy matters
-
-
Definitely not the only solution. Info on registers is first step - need good traditional investigation and prosecution.
-
But I think it's a myth that professionals will guarantee quality. Just because it's got a notary's stamp doesn't mean it's the right info.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And info on what companies are doing / are owned by is crucial for healthy economies. Here's
@CountCulture fav quote https://www.opengovpartnership.org/blog/chris-taggart/2013/10/28/why-opening-company-ownership-data-good-business …pic.twitter.com/TIJbzoXNGM
-
I think two different Qs - how to make it easy for those who want to assure ID to do so, & how to make it hard for criminals to hide.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.