...but almost universally *private* only.
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham @jeremydcape and
That's fine, I wouldn't expect otherwise, but examples like the latest
@Oxfam piece suggest not as much as there should be! :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @p_sfitz @jeremydcape and
Wish those who lay into
@Oxfam would input to http://datafortaxjustice.net/what-do-they-pay/ …2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @jeremydcape and
1. But this is already a very loaded output! In part a variant of just what
@DanNeidle complained about earlier.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @p_sfitz @alexcobham and
3. So happy to contribute to eg args about desirability, interpetration and meaning of this data, but unlikely to the data set itself
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @p_sfitz @jeremydcape and
Thanks Patrick, that would be really appreciated.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @p_sfitz and
A nice thing about that project is the space for different expertise
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alexcobham @p_sfitz and
E.g. I'm no open data expert but can look at economic questions...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @p_sfitz and
Others bring data, legal, accounting, tax expertise and so on.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @p_sfitz and
Alex - when I made this suggestion back in Jan I was told it was unwelcome
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
&“the whole premise of yr argument .. is flawed from beginning to end”.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.