their other tactic is to try to discredit and bully other commentators
-
-
Replying to @JudithFreedman @MForstater and
and to oversimplify debate, as article points out.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman @MForstater
I feel I should note in this context that strategic policy & debate influence by no means unique here.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @phdskat
I agree campaigners shld do what they do 2 influence policy. But journalists & orgs also need 2 do their job well
@JudithFreedman1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @JudithFreedman
Certainly. Though again, that applies generally. Not specific to TJN or NGOs more broadly in tax policy arena.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @phdskat @MForstater
but cornering as described here sounds like deception.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman @MForstater
One problem is that advisers generally stay out of debate. No upside for us and plenty of downside.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm sure there are other think tanks with different political orientation that can comment
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Omri_Marian @DanNeidle and
But I think the fault here is with the paper. Not commentators.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
well if they didn't approach say the IFS for comment then I'd agree poor journalism.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
agreed. @sbowers00 must be aware he’s not quoting varied experts here. But readers may not
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.