This is very interesting, for various reasons...https://twitter.com/tpsummit/status/789383226087186432 …
-
-
Replying to @phdskat
1) Important and relevant to have public debate on how tax authorities are constructing tax gap estimate and its size. Numbers matter.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @phdskat
2)
@guardian cites three distinct experts criticising HMRC estimate. Guess what? They're all@TaxJusticeNet1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @phdskat
2b) Goes to show position TJN occupies in (UK) public tax debate. Not new, but a noteworthy example.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @phdskat
maybe it just shows that
@guardian doesn't do very extensive research?@MForstater2 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Any paper will first reach out to those persons/organisations that are visible and known, good or bad
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
yes, that is how lobbying works, of course, but a good newspaper will seek balance.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Certainly. I'm not making a normative case, but noting this as an example of TJN positioning.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
its this 'cornering' tactic (in fact same three as @LenSeabrooke mentions! ) http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/pais/research/researchcentres/csgr/green/papers/workingpapers/no._41_seabrooke_and_wigan.pdf …pic.twitter.com/24bu89Olpl
-
-
Makes sense as a campaigning tactic. But poor of
@guardian to play along.@sbowers001 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @LenSeabrooke and
indeed. It is deeply cynical behaviour that
@BBCr4today should also note.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.