(2) artificially low commission rate?
-
-
4 a thing 2b a tax risk factor there has 2b tax law by reference 2 which the tax might b understated
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin @MForstater and
so in order to get a positive from my test you would need to have identified that relevant tax law
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Section 416, Income Tax Act 2007 Condition A 'the gift takes the form of a sum of money'?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
nearly there ... gift is structured 2b money, so you need a basis for looking behind the structure
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
4 it to work u hv to get the person who thinks they are donating a shoe, & the vol who thinks they are accepting donations...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
...to play along with the fake commission deal....riskier than just saying 'thanks for donating the shoes, we will sell them'
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
maybe but u need 2 identify the law which you say that recharacterisation risk arises by reference 2 (Ramsay principle perhaps?)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
seems straightforward application of yr model to me. Someone donates clothes to my charity. I cld accept donation & sell them
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
no - you cannot treat yourself as having applied my model without identifying the tax risk factor, which includes relevant law
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
- how would u chart the journey from being a regular charity shop to filing as commission sales&cash donation operation?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.