both in the 'some-say-avoidance-some-say-normal-business-practice' area.
-
-
Illustrates how hard it is to define. Both would fail @_DavidQuentin 's 'risk mining' test I think?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
what do you identify as the tax risk factor introduced by the planning?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(1) volunteers have to explain scheme & roles to ppl dropping goods http://www.taxation.co.uk/taxation/Articles/2010/01/06/254311/it-s-my-bag …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
(2) artificially low commission rate?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
4 a thing 2b a tax risk factor there has 2b tax law by reference 2 which the tax might b understated
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin @MForstater and
so in order to get a positive from my test you would need to have identified that relevant tax law
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Section 416, Income Tax Act 2007 Condition A 'the gift takes the form of a sum of money'?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
nearly there ... gift is structured 2b money, so you need a basis for looking behind the structure
4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
(says me who is finishing up charts for a book chapter deadline)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
yup. I’m editing on a Friday night while my kids are out on the town
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.