Lawyers v economists, round 2. A response to @_DavidQuentin (I imagine of interest to nobody else. Barely to me). https://docs.google.com/document/d/1aGh2dG6J9i8nnKU1yyYr8Mx7mEJ1RO3Gp1j3rWMdGDY/edit?usp=docslist_api …
@_DavidQuentin While yr broader pt is fair enough, yr post mangles concepts i.e. 'economic welfare' cannot apply to non humans @CarterPaddy
-
-
@MForstater as I read it, it *warns* of a mangling of concepts - but if it mangles concepts to do so, it still achieves its aim -
@_DavidQuentin sorry, you've lost me completely there!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.