Agreed: "right...that tax incidence is only part of story, wrong...that concern with real people is misguided" #CIThttps://twitter.com/MForstater/status/704250535864565760 …
-
-
Replying to @delaFeriaR
@delaFeriaR@MForstater who says concern with real people is misguided?@CarterPaddy is knocking down straw men http://dqtax.tumblr.com/post/140497512031/tax-incidence-revisited …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin U seem to be arguing w basic econ defn of ‘tax incidence’ (=distributn of welfare impacts of a tax)
@delaFeriaR@CarterPaddy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@delaFeriaR@CarterPaddy no I am not; I am saying "basic econ defn" can't be applied w/out refinement to non-human taxpayer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin and yet economists of all kinds (not just those from ‘right wing think tanks’) do it all the time!
@delaFeriaR@CarterPaddy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@delaFeriaR@CarterPaddy I know, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@_DavidQuentin Because what you are arguing with is part of the definition! @delaFeriaR @CarterPaddy
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.