Maya Forstater

@AislingTax @JolyonMaugham So q to both: are you of view that no anti-avoidance measure in (even NHS) procurement is feasible?

@alexcobham @AislingTax important note: it's an EU procurement law question not a tax question so we're not really the experts...

@alexcobham EU rules - procurement can include limited intl social stds (eg ILO) but not general corp respnsity @JolyonMaugham @AislingTax

@alexcobham on tax exclusion relates to judicial or administrative decision in accordance w law @JolyonMaugham @AislingTax

@alexcobham Of course if there's a competition law angle then @SteveLincolnOx would be yer man @JolyonMaugham @MForstater

@AislingTax @alexcobham @SteveLincolnOx @JolyonMaugham (plus obv. discrimination problem with @FairTaxMark as only open to UK co.s (so far))

@MForstater @AislingTax @alexcobham @SteveLincolnOx @JolyonMaugham Only if require it - OK if factor in as an example of compliance. Paul M

@FairTaxMark @AislingTax @alexcobham @SteveLincolnOx @JolyonMaugham whole question of 'fair' is beyond compliance though