@MForstater Look at costs. If data required by law, additional compliance for open publishing (probably) < 0. So BCR =?
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham = unknown/ low (probably) = unknown2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@alexcobham - just because an intervention is apparently low cost does not mean its CBR = incredibly high!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@alexcobham e.g. It would cost govt next to nothing to publish the sex offenders register =/= a compelling case that they should1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater can't really go much further if you won't consider the argument I actually made Maya1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham - low publishing cost argument cld apply to every bit of personal or confidential statutory data govt collects. Not compelling1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Sigh. That's not the argument made. If benefits likely large and positive, and costs negative, case strong. See paper for case.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham but paper says benefits unknown - and could be negative. That’s what it says.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater No. It doesn't and it's not. I give up!pic.twitter.com/UOH3hFZcG2
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham NB: I think e.g. there is good case for extractive transparency. But benefits in practice have been hard https://eiti.org/blog/what-point-transparency …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcobham - I think its way previous to pronounce that a robust analysis of CBCR shows 'extraordinarily high' CBR
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.