To conclude the whole £1bn Google profit ought to be UK taxable, you must think engineering and design adds no value https://hiyamaya.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/did-the-uk-really-agree-to-charge-google-a-3-tax-rate/ …
-
-
Replying to @CarterPaddy
@CarterPaddy this looks like it's double counting the 75% cost/income ratio1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dsquareddigest
@dsquareddigest not sure I get you. Is that same point I make here?: https://hiyamaya.wordpress.com/2016/01/25/did-the-uk-really-agree-to-charge-google-a-3-tax-rate/#comment-99 …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarterPaddy
@CarterPaddy just by multiplying UK revenue by global margin, you've already deducted a pro rata share of engineering, R&D etc.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dsquareddigest
@dsquareddigest@CarterPaddy - but only at cost price - you haven't allowed for any profit to go to engineering, R&D etc...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@CarterPaddy the post tax profit is the return on capital1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@dsquareddigest @CarterPaddy -sure but the question is where to tax. No international principle that it should all be at the sales end
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.