@martinhearson yes quite bland. No strong objections but is it needed? Better use of existing info powers instead? But "must do something" !
-
-
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson there has been a significant behavioural shift over last 5 years & HRCP was a success. Q whether code/hassle will influence?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@hselftax On strategy, I think the interesting discussions will be internal ones between tax dept, Board and Audit Comm1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @TimLawTax
@TimLawTax@martinhearson agreed, but hardly new. I briefed main Board regularly >10 years ago.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hselftax
@hselftax@martinhearson Agreed. Tax talking to Board not new. Having to agree a public statement on approach to tax might be.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimLawTax
@TimLawTax@hselftax@martinhearson - Seems like a fair enough idea to me1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@TimLawTax@martinhearson I don't disagree - but am sceptical that it will change behaviour of high risk companies.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hselftax
@hselftax@TimLawTax@martinhearson - I'm sure you are right, but seems a reasonable thing to ask to publish & have scrutiny & dialog2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@hselftax @TimLawTax @martinhearson & public debate & analysis about what is good, better, best practice etc....
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.