@alexcobham @RichardJMurphy says its primarily & unambiguously to ensure that govts of poor countries can deliver health & ed? @fcablog
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@RichardJMurphy@fcablog Expected revenue-generating role =/= CbCR based on assumg "tonne of non-oil/mining FDI in poorest ctys"1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@RichardJMurphy@fcablog - if revenues not from FDI then where from?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@RichardJMurphy@fcablog The assumption is that greater transparency can support more effective taxation. No tonnes involved.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@MForstater@RichardJMurphy@fcablog An assumption that I recognise you dispute, which is of course your prerogative. But...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@RichardJMurphy@fcablog It might well do. I remain unconvinced either way.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@alexcobham@RichardJMurphy but when ppl say its to"ensure tax paid in right place etc... so that the poor cld have healthcare & education"2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@RichardJMurphy So uncertainty over revenue amount or actual allocation means it shouldn't be discussed? Think that's silly.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@RichardJMurphy No of course not. But its not uncertain. Its nowhere near enough.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@RichardJMurphy Nowhere near enough for more health and education??1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham @RichardJMurphy - yes.
8:34 AM - 16 Jun 2015
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.