@HeatherLoweGFI @niawag2011 but gives an idea of it it is a big number, and how big. Aid comparison implies fungiability between economies
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@niawag2011 If that's how you decide to view it. Completely subjective, and your approach no more valid then the other.1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @HeatherLoweGFI
@HeatherLoweGFI@niawag2011 - what is the point of data if it ok to mix & match the numbers any which way? http://www.cgdev.org/blog/talking-about-tax-taxing-pretending-it-simple-will-hurt-poor …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI that is the point of data. to be able to see trends, make comparisons, explore reality. 1/n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niawag2011
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI not all analysis and comparison is correct or enlightening. but it's not wrong to try. 2/n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niawag2011
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI What do you think is the point of data if not that? 3/31 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niawag2011
@niawag2011@HeatherLoweGFI - I agree. That is the point. But then not 'completely subjective with no approach more valid etc... '1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI I didn't say that and don't believe it. But different kinds of analysis have different purposes, validity. 1/n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niawag2011
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI you didn't like my meme, but couldn't (wouldn't?) propose an alternative that could work as a meme. 2/n1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @niawag2011
@MForstater@HeatherLoweGFI you can hate all reductionist analysis/memes. But I think mine was fair use of info & served my purpose. 3/n2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@niawag2011 Talk next Friday…? :-)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.