And Lush gets its @FairTaxMark for having voluntarily committed to public, country-by-country reporting http://economia.icaew.com/news/february-2015/lush-gets-fair-tax-mark … Who's next?
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham Lush doesn’t look like it publishes much data at all. Is@fairtaxmark for commitment to CbC in future?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Criteria for@FairTaxMark are transparent and clear, take a look.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@MForstater@FairTaxMark but is it not ironic that u think ok to produce info for you and not the public? Why you and not HMRC?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman@alexcobham@FairTaxMark - no, i don't think the've produced them at all. FTM criteria judge public docs.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@alexcobham@FairTaxMark and only those?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman@MForstater@alexcobham Criteria assess "quality of a business’s publicly available information" http://fairtaxmark.net/criteria/2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @agoodall4
@agoodall4@JudithFreedman@alexcobham Yes. On public record: I.e. accounts submitted to CH & financial statements on company website1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@agoodall4@JudithFreedman@alexcobham maybe already submitted but not yet up at CH? Seems odd to have to pay £1 for the info when it is up2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@agoodall4@JudithFreedman indeed, being processed for both CH and for (free) online publication1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcobham @agoodall4 @JudithFreedman - and the scorecards?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.