@JolyonMaugham @fcablog I don't think either. I suspect that the people polled are poorly informed and that the survey was poorly worded.
-
-
Replying to @lauradragon
@lauradragon@fcablog I'll take that as a "no" to my question. Link here http://comres.co.uk/polls/Christian_Aid_Tax_Avoidance_Feb_2013.pdf …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @fcablog
@fcablog@JolyonMaugham "Interviewed" online? How was sample selected? Begs question of where people get info from to form their views.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lauradragon
@lauradragon@fcablog and now you're saying people are uninformed (i.e. stupid).2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham@fcablog Uninformed ≠ stupid. Where do people polled get their information from? Survey could have asked.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @lauradragon
@lauradragon@fcablog yet it is only in the tax arena that a small minority discount the views of the public as "uninformed".3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham@lauradragon@fcablog - See for example... http://www.one.org/us/2013/01/09/video-telling-americans-the-truth-about-foreign-aid/ … misinformed doesn't mean stupid. Public need better info!3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@lauradragon "misinformed" (a) in some contexts is and (b) in others not code for "stupid". Examples of (b) don't disprove (a).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham@lauradragon@fcablog sure, but when subject is complex and public info weak, surveys often poor tools for understanding...2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@JolyonMaugham @lauradragon @fcablog engagement mechanisms e.g. deliberative dialog get beyond superficial answers http://www.involve.org.uk/blog/2011/06/28/deliberative-public-engagement-nine-principles/ ….
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@lauradragon@fcablog I'd agree that quantitative data doesn't get to the 'why'1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@MForstater@lauradragon@fcablog (perhaps more accurately, *this* quantitative data doesn't get to the why)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.