Gosh. trying not to take that personally.https://twitter.com/martinhearson/status/524530946587238400 …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater earlier you implied that if NGOs take accuracy seriously, then they will engage in debate on your terms. Not necessarily.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson - anyway, seriously, your thoughts on better approach? Am trying to be constructive. Ignoring flaky numbers not an option.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater I like the question. Tell me starting assumptions: what are you ultimately trying to achieve, and what's your theory of change?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson sorta too long for a tweet but this is my mental model & history http://phd.mshaffer.com/projects/nike/stuff/The%20Path%20to%20Corporate%20Responsibility.pdf …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@martinhearson Lessons from apparel sector 1) you have to get beyond the brick throwing stage 2) initial assumptions likely to be wrong1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@martinhearson 3) collaboration & transparency can get you so far 4) but ultimately rule of law needed 5)good/bad guys thinking unhelpful1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@martinhearson 6)economics matter 7) data matters. (sorry, waaaay to long for twitter, but thanks for prompting the thought!)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@martinhearson but basically think that serious complex problems need our best analysis. common definitions & data bring ppl round the table
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.