Gosh. trying not to take that personally.https://twitter.com/martinhearson/status/524530946587238400 …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater earlier you implied that if NGOs take accuracy seriously, then they will engage in debate on your terms. Not necessarily.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @fcablog
@fcablog@MForstater corrections are one thing, but apologies? to whom?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@fcablog The public. Organisations have a responsibility not to use dodgy stats (at least i’ve always thought they did)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@fcablog Sure. But I don't think apologies are needed unless a campaign is fundamentally misguided, eg http://www.independent.co.uk/news/greenpeaces-brent-spar-apology-1599647.html …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@fcablog sure not Brent Spar proportions. But could be less grudging and confusing than this! http://www.christianaid.org.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/comment/christian-aid-research-on-commodity-trading-via-switzerland.aspx …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@martinhearson @fcablog and so the statistic is still being reported.....http://uk.reuters.com/article/2014/10/03/zambia-taxes-idUKL6N0RY2CG20141003 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.