@JolyonMaugham I think opposite - mums' leave 4 pregnancy/birth/recovery period + standard parent leave on a use-it-or-lose-it basis 4 all
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater not that much difference actually: I would add only a reserved period of dad's leave to your suggestion2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham Difference would be that leave is an employment right, on becoming a parent. Not dependent on gender or family choices.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham - transferable parental leave keeps assumption that mum = main parent. Eg Dad can get transferable leave from working mum 1/3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater your reading of what I meant (and not what I meant). So we're even closer1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham - yes agree. Only difference non transferability. But important for not making extended dad leave a zero sum game for family1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater it's not compulsory - and performs important 'nudge' function1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham Right - and making it use-it-or-lose-it instead of transferable would increase nudge1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater we may be at cross purposes: suspect we agree.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JolyonMaugham I agree we mainly agree! But I wld change yr proposal 2 reserved period 4 birth & equal non transferable period any parent
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.