@fcablog it is irrelevant to the CT debate. You can't counter a counter-purposive outcome by saying 'I pay other tax' @stevenbuckley
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @fcablog
@fcablog as just pointed out, if you frame the debate as counter- or pro-purposive you can have a level playing field@stevenbuckley1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham@fcablog I think point is willingness to engage on technical clarification on this but not this: http://www.christianaid.org.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/comment/christian-aid-response-to-tax-avoidance-scheme-media-coverage.aspx … ?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@fcablog have they not been willing to engage on their press release? I found them pretty responsive...@stevenbuckley1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham@fcablog@stevenbuckley sorry wrong link! [blush]1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@JolyonMaugham@fcablog@stevenbuckley ....this one: http://www.christianaid.org.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/comment/the-price-of-tax-dodging-in-the-developing-world.aspx …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@JolyonMaugham@fcablog rather a lot of @ replies to read! On train, so wont attempt to answer now but will once digested them3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
@stevenbuckley @JolyonMaugham @fcablog - must be off train by now! ;-) Would an email be helpful
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.