@JolyonMaugham I'm not sure what you're implying here? @RichardJMurphy
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham I am saying you need transparent criteria and a cross section of people judging them@RichardJMurphy1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham Good - hope you agree criteria are transparent, advisory group is independent & judging self-explanatory.@RichardJMurphy2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham I can't find criteria on your website and am not comfortable with 'judging' panel1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham Sorry you're uncomfortable with people involved. I hope criteria so clear http://cgd.to/MDv9XJ that you can set this aside2 replies 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham those are not criteria - they are headlines. Where is the detailed scoring system?1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @JolyonMaugham
@JolyonMaugham You have to follow the links! So here for example is the UK business version http://cgd.to/1c4oA6O2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@JolyonMaugham Judging from@MATruman's article, the problem with weighting is still there. Can you confirm please?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenSaund
@BenCTA
@JolyonMaugham@MATruman to extent that affects part of score of two marks out of twenty...3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@JolyonMaugham@MATruman So it does still affect FTM? It'd be 4 points if it gives a higher score, rather than a lower one...2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@BenCTA @alexcobham @JolyonMaugham @MATruman - I think is only 2 marks, as can get 2 marks bonus back for explanation? (p18)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.