@MForstater UNHCR as distributor. Both available on market, so r other global feline brands. Choice is only an option for those w means
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater We are merely recipients. In the previous case, it is the only BOGO model that does it right. Instead of product, it invests1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tmsruge
@tmsruge - Investmnt good but does product meet needs e.g. this study - girls choose disposable over free cloth pads http://www.doublexeconomy.com/publications-projects-2/sanitary-care-and-girls-education/ …3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater But in case of not having any option vs 1 option, better to have 1 option than none. Has to start somewhere. Access & edu needed1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Not sure what you are arguing.. Are you saying it is wrong that they are manufactured in Uganda to meet their girls needs?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@tmsruge - it may be a nice idea - like playpumps etc... which turns out not to work. Always danger when some agency is choosing soln 4 ppl.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Plypumps ≠ create jobs & locals didn’t create them, are imported sols. Struggling 2blieve ur defending import vs local capacity2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.