@dslesperance While patronising @chakrabortty re degree subject, this doesn't seem a serious econ argument against eg http://ctj.org/ctjreports/2013/11/twitter_and_other_tech_firms_poised_to_shelter_11_billion_in_profits_using_stock_option_tax_loophole.php#.UoKwa6VFAm9 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@dslesperance@chakrabortty http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2013/11/06/memo-to-citizens-for-tax-justice-of-course-stock-options-are-a-tax-deductible-they-couldnt-possibly-be-anything-else/ … This explains the taxation of options1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @worstall
@worstall@dslesperance@chakrabortty Thanks Tim. A bit extreme, given eg FASB held this position til 2006, don't you think?4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@worstall - If this plain vanilla stuff is presented as devious 'tax dodging/avoidance/abuse' then the concept is meaningless2 replies 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@alexcobham Quite. It's simply a political move by the likes of@RichardJMurphy to get his opinions made into law1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @worstall
@worstall@MForstater@RichardJMurphy This personalisation of serious issues is silly. I'm out.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcobham @worstall - like ‘avoidance’, ‘loophole’, ‘shelter’ etc.. Whatever debate on tax t’ment of options may be it does not fit them
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.