@MForstater no code omerta, I just prefer to discuss the underlying argument of a piece
Starting to think there is a code of Omertà in tax debates to never say ‘that’s not avoidance/loophole etc’ of a fellow’s claim. Not healthy
-
-
-
@martinhearson ok as individual, but something wrong as a movement if basic misunderstanding never corrected, words allowed to mean anything
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.