@alexcobham - it’s not ‘unpaid expenses' though - it’s payment in kind with a chunk of property -https://twitter.com/MForstater/status/397818378964189184 …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater I don't think anyone is arguing this is imaginary money, or costless; q is whether it is should be a tax-deductible expense1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham wd it make a difference to your view if income taxed on individuals? Genuine q.@MForstater1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hselftax
@hselftax@MForstater I think it is, no? But the point is around whether or not equivalent to expense from corporate side.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@hselftax seems weird not to, if cld achieve same result for corp & employee by selling shares & giving $ bonus. whats the diff?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@hselftax I think we risk circularity here! But: timing & crystallised value - different if wait til share value known.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@hselftax - Tax expense IS taken when the share value is known, no?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@hselftax but unknown when option provided, hence the difference (and part of the 'some economists' divergence)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@hselftax - who are ‘some economists’? (Genuine Q) and do you see this as a loophole/ avoidance (i.e. against intent of legsln?)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@hselftax as discussed previously in this conversation, from CTJ Facebook report2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcobham - I just wondered who they are! It’s not th creation of shares (dillution)thats the expense it’s giving them away (compensation)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.