BLOG POST - "Filing positions": what they are and what they mean for the avoidance debate http://tmblr.co/Z66NUqzAqs4k
-
-
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin - Am I reading right? Are u saying that setting up intl supply/ online business hubs is inherently dodgy & irresponsible?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater no you are not reading right - your eye has clearly skipped over both instances of the phrase "tax havens" in that paragraph :)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin - but wouldn’t PE and TP uncertainties arise wherever the hubs is?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater the difference is that if hub is in a real jurisdiction, tax risk for opco jurisdiction would not have been created deliberately1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin - the examples u link to - SABMiller & Amazon seem to be in the campaign/reputation risk zone more than compliance risk zone?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Amazon PE risk is >0%. TP risk on export of Castle beer brand, Zug management fees &c is >0%.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_ClairQuentin
@_DavidQuentin - that’s my point - doubt it’s possible to run a biz like Amazon w 0 tax risk. End up assuming that any intra-trade is dodgy?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater your point is not taken against my blog post; I expressly explain that non-deliberate tax risk arises in course of business2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@_DavidQuentin -bulk of your post is about risk levels - useful - why add additional layer of deliberate (vs accidental?) risk?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.