@alexcobham @_DavidQuentin @martinhearson @fcablog @BenCTA not at all, but change must come from gvts, at domestic and international levels.
-
-
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman If accept premise (which I don't) that rationality implies tax minimisation, then no solution from domestic level, surely?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham@JudithFreedman many MNCs recognise aggressive avoidance can damage reputation. If costs >tax benefits, rational to pay tax.1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @hselftax
@hselftax@alexcobham indeed, but that is a decision based on bottom line and not true CSR.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman@alexcobham agree. But an interesting debate is whether a corp ever altruistic or if all CSR is for ultimate value to co?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @hselftax
@hselftax@JudithFreedman@alexcobham This is the "CSR witch test"- biz motivated=not altruistic 'Burn her!' altruistic=not strategic ditto1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@hselftax@alexcobham sorry, twitter does not work for me on this. What are you talking about?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman@hselftax@alexcobham - aka 'the witch test'pic.twitter.com/6fhqyJKtvp
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@JudithFreedman@hselftax@alexcobham my view: altruism a red herring. CSR serious when responds to risks & customers - a LT view on profit1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater@hselftax@alexcobham Companies have always responded to risk and should do so. CSR seems to me to be the red herring!3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JudithFreedman @hselftax @alexcobham CSR Q is not “how much to pay?” but “what role to play in supporting RoL & public confidence in it?”
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.