@martinhearson b) say the wider objective is 'informed public debate on taxation' ...then yes it matters.
-
-
-
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson but yes if the means to 'tax justice' is 'misinformed public debate' then no I don't sign up to that.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson - glad to hear it! So we agree that better informed public debate is a good thing. That is why it is important….1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater the debate I want is not about whether Oxfam got their sums wrong, but how to fix the underlying [tax] problem.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson - otherwise a huge “trust us” to say ‘we may be playing fast & loose w the numbers but we are identifying the problem right’2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Alas, it is bed time in Kenya. I'm fine with you pointing out NGO errors, but please don't make that your only contribution.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson - you haven’t said if you think Kofi Annan’s statement, based on GFI estimate is a misunderstanding - would you take a look.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater not unless you first write something demonstrating your interest in this debate beyond picking holes in other people's work4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@martinhearson …and the ‘correct’ thing to do, apparently, is say nothing.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.