@martinhearson the bit on transfer pricing :-? CT system should take account of externalised costs - 'like exploiting low skilled workers'??
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
.
@MForstater I'd be more interested in what you had to say if I'd ready anything positive from you on this agenda. So far just criticism.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson "If you don't have anything nice to say don't say it"? Apols for shortness of tweets & comment, but not for asking questions!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater you have a blog, why not use it to set out something propositional on tax and development, rather than taking pot shots at NGOs?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson - it worries me that no one (?) seems to think it is a problem if the public is bamboozled by figures that aren't robust.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater It's good to scrutinise, I agree, but hard to respond to you without knowing where you are coming from in a v polarised debate1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson that is the thing though, no one scrutinised those figures b4 or after publication. It doesn't help advance understanding.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater b) if objective is 'tax justice' this is not the most important debate, but it's the only debate you seem interested in having1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson b) say the wider objective is 'informed public debate on taxation' ...then yes it matters.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@martinhearson I think the end is sustble devt. Public revenues & good gov an important means to that. & informed public debate critical.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.