BBC highlights @Oxfam 's demands for an end to #tax dodging at the #G20 http://tinyurl.com/qetzqcr #G20voices”
-
-
Replying to @Mark_Goldring1
@Mark_Goldring1@Oxfam - Could Oxfam have got its figures wrong about transfer pricing? http://hiyamaya.wordpress.com/2013/09/09/38-4-billion-is-a-very-big-number-but-what-does-it-mean/ …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@mforstater@mark_goldring1@oxfam Hi again. Estimates are trade mispricing not transfer mispricing (see presser: http://tinyurl.com/puu96tn )2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmmaSeery
@EmmaSeery@Mark_Goldring1 “Trade mispricing is a way of moving money around to avoid paying tax where a company is really doing business”2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@mforstater@mark_goldring1 Because trade mispricing includes both transfer mispricing and false invoicing. Headline includes both2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EmmaSeery
@EmmaSeery@Mark_Goldring1 The headline numbers $160 and 38.4 bn do not measure transfer pricing. They estimate false invoicing1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@mforstater I meant the headline figure of 38.43 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@EmmaSeery 2) is because it is a measure of capital flight, not tax loss. So say tax is 25% could roughly say govs loose 10bn.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.