A footnote on the @CDCgroup story: staggering that it took FoI (!) to uncover details of ODA flows via #taxhavens. Great work @ClaireProvost
-
-
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham - Srsly? quarterly reports on capital by fund name and domicile: http://www.cdcgroup.com/Documents/Transparency%20and%20reporting/CDC%20Fund%20Information%20April%202013.pdf … = not exactly top secret!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Odd, isn't it? Investment positions transparent(ish), but not the flows designated ODA!2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham everyone loves a scandal, but this isn't a story about uncovering hidden info, its about what best for CDC develpment impact1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater That's how the story was run, isn't it? I was just pointing out that it's unfortunate that such data is only available via FoI.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham
@alexcobham Doesn't mean we have to run after it that way. Serious topic deserves more than silly season coverage.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater you miss my point. The story was run exactly as you said you would like; the FoI angle was only in my one later tweet.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@alexcobham :-) I read it the other way e.g ‘evidence revealed by Gu was staggering & indefensible' - tweets all running w ‘data reveals’
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.