Critique of Fair Tax Mark http://bensaunderscta.wordpress.com/2013/06/16/fair-tax-mark-i-really-dont-think-so/ … and rebuttal http://www.fairtaxmark.net/fair-tax-mark/the-fair-tax-mark-dealing-with-criticisms-of-our-methodology …. This so needs an independent technical committee.
-
-
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater They know the methodology is flawed because they've ignored the results it throws out. So why do they trust it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @BenSaund
@BenSaundersCTA@fcablog - clearly, & presumably all the organisations that haven't endorsed it also know it is flawed but are keeping quiet1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@BenSaundersCTA@fcablog - An independent technical committee, review of methodology, beta version etc..would have helped, no?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @fcablog
@fcablog@BenSaundersCTA - (1) I agree. But my point is it is uncooked because it wasn't developed through a process to cook it3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@fcablog@BenSaundersCTA (2) - i.e. transparent independent review of the methodology, itteration rather than rebuttal when weaknesses found1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@fcablog @BenSaundersCTA (3/3) In my view all these public campaign tax reports need this kind of quality control
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.