@JudithFreedman @matruman a 'careful analysis' that skips over some detailed answers @bakhunin gave her last week at http://martinhearson.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/abfs-misleading-statements-and-journalistic-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-440 …
-
-
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@matruman@bakhunin thanks but I thought she was answering some of the points you made here quite well.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JudithFreedman
@JudithFreedman@MATruman she doesn't mention@bakhunin's argument re the $7.4m and CIT v WHT. Fine to disagree, but needs mentioning.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @martinhearson
@martinhearson@JudithFreedman@MATruman@Bakhunin 3/3 - “we cld have said WHT” does not answer Q on assumptions behind CIT allegation!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater
@MForstater Mike has explained his reasoning.You're entitled to disagree but post shd have acknowledged.@JudithFreedman@MATruman@Bakhunin2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@martinhearson @JudithFreedman @MATruman @Bakhunin If ABF booked 47m in fake expenses as the CIT estimate implies, that would be illegal no?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.