@JudithFreedman @matruman a 'careful analysis' that skips over some detailed answers @bakhunin gave her last week at http://martinhearson.wordpress.com/2013/02/11/abfs-misleading-statements-and-journalistic-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-440 …
-
@JudithFreedman@MATruman she doesn't mention@bakhunin's argument re the $7.4m and CIT v WHT. Fine to disagree, but needs mentioning.
@martinhearson @JudithFreedman @MATruman @Bakhunin 3/3 - “we cld have said WHT” does not answer Q on assumptions behind CIT allegation!
-
-
@MForstater Mike has explained his reasoning.You're entitled to disagree but post shd have acknowledged.@JudithFreedman@MATruman@Bakhunin -
@martinhearson@JudithFreedman@MATruman@Bakhunin big jump from ‘unable to verify substance’ to alleging 47m spent on phantom contractors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.